Hall of Fame Weekend … The Nitschke Luncheon

From North Canton, Ohio

OK, I’m no Hank Young, but there was the picture of the day standing right in front of me in living color.

So I pulled out the phone and snapped a shot of two remaining members of the American Football League’s Foolish Club as they talked on Friday.

That’s Ralph Wilson on the left, owner of the Buffalo Bills. That’s Bud Adams on the right, owner of the Houston Oilers now Tennessee Titans. The man who should have been standing with them was the late Lamar Hunt.

Wilson and Adams were attending the one of the highlights of the Hall of Fame weekend in Canton. It’s the Friday lunch where all returning members of the Pro Football Hall of Fame gather and welcome this year’s induction class.

Only Hall of Fame members, the Hall’s board of selectors, Hall officials and those people presenting inductees are allowed to attend. It’s called the Nitschke Luncheon because the late Packers LB Ray Nitschke used to run the lunch and serve as a master of ceremonies. These days, those duties usually fall to the great pass rusher Deacon Jones and others.

It’s one of the greatest events I’ve had the pleasure of being part of in over 30 years of covering the game. This Friday at North Canton’s Fieldcrest School was my third Nitschke Luncheon and the sights and sounds are always amazing.

What’s said there remains there, that’s part of the code, but generally the event is to prepare the incoming class for the emotions they’ll go through when they stand on the stage at Fawcett Stadium on Saturday evening.

But I can reveal some of the sights. There was a group of four people standing together … John Madden, Willie Lanier, Troy Aikman and Marv Levy all laughing at a story Madden just told. Len Dawson and Dan Dierdorf sat next to each other kibitzing as all the Hall of Famers gathered for a picture. Standing together for the picture were groupings like Dave Casper, Jack Youngblood and Bob Griese. And over there were Bobby Bell, Jan Stenerud and Emmitt Thomas, standing together again. Old Packers Willie Davis and Bart Starr stood with a more recent member of the Packers, James Lofton.

Once the team picture was taken, the group enjoyed some refreshments and the pairings are always interesting to see. Roger Staubach, Rod Woodson and Darrell Green were deep in conversation. Later, Woodson was asking someone to take a picture as he stood with Franco Harris.

There was a Buffalo huddle with Bruce Smith, Thurman Thomas, Jim Kelly and Ted Cotrell all enjoying a laugh. Out on the sidewalk under a shade tree Lynn Swann talked with Tony Dorsett and his son. Larry Wilson hung back under another tree, pulling on a cigarette.

Starr and Frank Gifford talking in the corner, and Forrest Gregg, Don Maynard and Raymond Berry all went in and grabbed seats for lunch together.

It was left to Willie Lanier to play the role of the sheep herder and as he tried to get everyone inside and seated so the lunch could begin. “Players don’t listen any better now than they did when they played,” Lanier said with a laugh.

Finally, he rounded up the group and they went inside for lunch, fellowship, some stories, some lies and experiences that you can’t buy.

Priceless? That’s the Nitschke Luncheon.


6 Responses to “Hall of Fame Weekend … The Nitschke Luncheon”

  • August 7, 2009  - Josh says:

    Oh to be a fly on the wall for that luncheon!


  • August 7, 2009  - Rin Tin Tin says:

    Real Rin ® daddy- o sez –

    “There was a huddle with” – Packers, Steelers, Chiefs, Bills, Raiders & – WHAT – no ‘BRONCO’ huddle?

    Oh, they only have 1 player who made their mark nee was truly theirs in the Hall of Fame.

    Never mind…


  • August 7, 2009  - anonymous says:

    Even a Nut finds a blind Squirrel sometimes. Good one Rin.


  • August 7, 2009  - Rin Tin Tin says:

    You’re buggin’- I, I say you’re buggin’ me boy!


  • August 7, 2009  - MadJew says:

    Yes but those damn donkeys have more SB victories and appearances than the Chiefs and that ranks higher than HoFers


  • August 7, 2009  - Rin Tin Tin says:

    Six of one half a dozen of the other…

    A 2-4 Superbowl tote Broncos be less impressive than a 1-1 Chiefs: 50% KC > 33% DEN.

    Too, that the Texans also won a Championship in ‘62 before Superbowls cannot be overlooked (the AFL Champion Texans had/have just as much right to call themself World Champs thence as the NFL team did arbitrarily without any qualms or sans any game to determine said/they vs the Texans.

    Too, it took the Broncos 5 Superbowl games/tries to win the 1st; the Chiefs won in their 2nd try.

    Was Marty Schottenheimer a great coach because he got his team ‘there’ (post season not Superbowls) so many times – only to lose?

    It’s not unlike some saying a Barry Bonds is a better homerun hitter than Ruth because he ‘got there’ a greater # times (hit more homeruns.)

    Is Bonds better than Ruth?

    No, he is not.

    Semantics & subjectivity being the realm of the pious, logic tells us that ‘placing’ more often as does having ‘more’ opportunities does not the final analysis dictate ‘more’ success; just also ran status sans the ultimate final victory.

    Many runners run and many horses place but only one can conclude Champion.

    Jim Brown’s 5.2 career yards per carry average makes him a better runner than an Emmitt Smith despite Smith’s having gained more yards than Brown (6000+ ‘more’ yards.) That Smith needed 2000+ ‘more’ carries (about a 2.95 average) is ‘more’ telling, my opine.

    Ditto for DEN having ‘more’ opportunities KC.

    ‘More’ does not necessarily equate with ‘greater’ in and of itself. One can say Bonds (as with the Broncos)was more ‘prolific’, hit/won more than a Ruth/Chiefs.

    But that it took DEN 5 games to win their first and a 6th game to win but their second doesn’t impress me per se. Similarly, that Bonds needed 837 ‘more’ atbats (extra tries) than a Ruth got to even ‘tie’ the Babe at 714 homeruns does not impress me. When Bonds had the same 3 of atbats (opportunities) as Ruth, Ruth had 714 homeruns and Bonds had 95 less, or only 619.

    Career, 1448 more atbats for a Bonds than a Ruth equates to only 48 more homeruns the former.

    More? Bonds/Broncos.

    Better? Ruth/Chiefs.

    Tomorrow: we shall discuss the Collatz problem & Lehmer’s Mahler Measure Problem.

    daddy-o


Leave a Reply



Photos by Hank Young

Podcasts

  
  • Podcasts

Categories

A-LIST-CLOSED
Bottom of Bird Cage
Chiefs Players
College football
Commentary
Cup O'Chiefs
Defense
Game Coverage
Hall of Fame
Herm Speaks
History
NFL Draft
NFL Review
Offense
Officiating
Other News
Pictures
Podcasts
Practice Update
Q&A
Statistics
Training Camp

Archives


RSS


Pages

Home