Shivering at Super Bowl 48 … Tuesday Cup O’Chiefs
Dream Chiefs fans, dream. A trip to the Super Bowl this coming February at the Jerry World Stadium in Arlington, Texas is farfetched at this point. The 2012 title game could be more doable, and that game goes down at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis. If it all falls together the next year, the Chiefs and their fans could reprise their trip to New Orleans for Super Bowl IV, by heading off to Super Bowl 47 at the Louisiana Superdome.
On Tuesday, the NFL will decide where they will hold Super Bowl 48 in February of 2014. As the NFL owners gathered on Monday at the Las Colinas resort in Dallas it sounded more and more likely that that game will be played in the new stadium in the New Jersey Meadowlands (above), the soon to open building that does not have a roof.
That’s right folks, a real cold weather Super Bowl, played outside in the elements whatever they may be for that early February day in the swamps of Jersey … only 17 votes among the 32 teams is required to make this happen.
The folks in New Jersey/New York can’t figure out why anybody wouldn’t think it’s a good idea.
“On a personal level there would be something very special about playing a game of this magnitude in this area, nearly 90 years after we started playing games in the Polo Grounds,” Giants co-owner John Mara told the New York Daily News. “It’s the most-anticipated sporting event of the year in this country. Let’s play it on the biggest stage in the world.”
There are three bids for the title game in ‘14: New Jersey/New York, Tampa Bay and Miami/Ft. Lauderdale. Each city will get 15 minutes to make its presentation to the owners on Tuesday afternoon.
”We’ll make sure … they understand all the venues, how New York City is the greatest stage in the world to throw an event, so the greatest game in the world would come to the greatest stage in the world,” said Jonathan Tisch, co-owner of the Giants and the co-chairman of the NJ/NY bid committee.
It’s not just the Giants and Jets ownership that wants this to happen.
“Ever since 9/11, I’ve hoped that something like this could happen,” Kraft told the Boston Globe. “It’s just reaffirming support for that great city and region, New Jersey and New York. … I see two major things: Payback to the people of that region in bringing what I think is the greatest sporting event in the world, to host it, and thank them for what’s gone on almost a decade later; And then also a thank you to the owners who stepped up and took one out there with real financial stakes.”
Having a hard time believing the NFL owners would expose their premier event to the potential of frostbite, sub-zero wind chill and a blizzard? Just this past February, a major snowstorm blew through the eastern corridor dumping not inches but snow measured in feet from Washington-Baltimore through Philadelphia and all the way to the New York suburbs.
It doesn’t make much sense; it’s like having a classic car and leaving it on the street in the winter with the possibility of ice, snow, wind and assorted other debilitating weather conditions battering the finish and rusting out the fenders. Even if you scratch the frozen surface of this idea and search for more, it still doesn’t make sense.
But the NFL league office has pushed hard for this; they want a home game, since the league office is across the Hudson River from the stadium. Commissioner Roger Goodell has been twisting arms and whispering in the ears of owners trying to make this happen. It would be a major chip for the Jets and Giants and their $1.7 billion stadium, and would attract hundreds of millions of dollars to Jersey and Manhattan with visitors.
And if it happens, what’s to keep other cold-weather teams from seeking the game in outdoor stadiums, like Philadelphia, Washington, Chicago, Denver, Seattle, or even Kansas City?
“With all due respect, Chicago or Pittsburgh or Cleveland or Washington or Green Bay, I don’t think they are all the same as New York,” Atlanta Falcons owner Arthur Blank told the New York Times. “Owners would have to decide in the future if any of those cities are unique enough, would create enough natural draw.”
There appears to be about a dozen teams that will vote yes, including of course the New York Jets and Giants. There appears to be about a dozen teams that will vote no, mainly teams in frozen cities like Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Detroit and Cincinnati.
That will leave the decision to be made by that remaining group of eight to 10 teams, which likely includes the Kansas City Chiefs.
The first vote will include all three entrants. If one gets 24 votes or more, the game will go there. If no city reaches that level, there will be another vote. If 24 votes does not land with one bidder, then the town with the fewest votes is out. That would leave two bidders, and a third vote to see if one of them can get 24 votes. If that doesn’t happen, then it comes down to a simple majority where 17 yes votes gets the Super Bowl for one city.
I’m sure if you are a Chiefs fan it wouldn’t matter if the game was played in Greenland should your team be participating. And, it’s not that I’m against trying something new. But this is something that’s not broken, and the NFL is trying to push a fix that could create a host of problems that will affect the actual playing of the game.
There are a host of domed stadiums and warm weather sites that can and have handled the Super Bowl, including those bidding this year in Tampa and Miami.
The other major item at the meetings was expected to be a vote on extending the new rules for overtime in the playoffs to the regular season. But the league chatter as the owners were arriving in Dallas was that a vote may not happen. Although there seemed to be support at the league meetings in March to extend the rule to the regular season, some teams want to see how the change works in the playoffs before committing to the entire season.
There will also be discussion on the labor situation involving the players and a new collective bargaining agreement. Part of that will be more talks on expanding the regular season to 18 games.
NFL PERSONNEL FILE/MONDAY, MAY 24
- BEARS – signed LB Brian Iwuh, who spent the previous four seasons with the Jaguars; released TE Kevin Brock, who was on the Chicago practice squad in ‘09 and also did time on the practice squads of the Jets, Steelers and Panthers.
- DOLPHINS – signed C/G Cory Proctor, who was released earlier this month by the Cowboys. He played for Miami head coach Tony Sparano, who was the Dallas offensive line coach; traded G Justin Smiley to the Jaguars for a conditional choice in the 2011 NFL Draft.
- RAMS – released LB Simoni Lawrence, LB Kennedy Tinsley, WR Nick Moore, WR Rod Owens and DL Chris Bradwell, all undrafted rookie free agents.
- SAINTS – signed FB Jason McKie to a 1-year contract – he comes over from the Bears; released DB Ryan Hamilton and RB Carlos Brown, both undrafted rookie free agents.
Seriously? … New York played the 9/11 card to try and get what they want? I’m sick of people using that date as an excuse for personal gain.
Weather is a factor in every pre-season game, every regular season game, and every playoff game. So why should the “big game” be any different?
That said, I don’t see that New York deserves it any more than anywhere else. And if they don’t play it in a cold-weather city? Then that’s fine, too.
Kansas City obviously has a unique tie to the Super Bowl as well then, since we played in the first one. I could see Clark Hunt and the Chiefs saying something like, “My dad came up with the name of the big game. Let’s have it in KC!” I think it opens up the possibility of coming to KC… even without the ROLLING ROOF.
Football in snow is fun, I hate to root for NYC, but will this one time.
I’m sort of a football purest. I think every game should be played outside on grass. Weather has always been a part of the game. The weather never kept the fans away in Green Bay or Minnesota. I think a cold weather city would add another interesting factor to a SB.
NFL football is to big a business to let weather effect its most important game on any given year. Without a dome, no cold weather stadium will get the superbowl.
That said the Hunt family have always put the good of the NFL over the Chiefs. I doubt they have any leverage for the big game.
Can’t argue with a cold weather Superbowl. The players & coaches will be just fine. The performance of the teams will be affected somewhat. I say, “so what”… Especially if one of the teams is used to playing in their cozy domes or warm weather zip codes.
My fascination will be the affect it will have on the fans in the stadium. I would find it very enjoyable to see the rich & famous suffering somewhat watching a cold & wet Superbowl. The colder the better. I know, I know… I should’nt be gleeful to see others suffer, but come on… would’nt it be nice to see some of the elitest or global warming crowd with ice crystals on their faces?. I’m sitting here grinning just thinking about it.
Vince Lombardi, Hank Stram, Tom Landry & Chuck Knox would all be in favor of a outdoor, cold weather Superbowl. How could anyone argue with that?.
Go Chiefs.
Jimbo, adding to your thoughts, I would love to see a cold weather superbowl based on the fans as well. If you have to freeze your butt off to watch the game then maybe there will be extra tickets available for REAL football fans rather than those who only care about “the big game.” As a side note, I live near Buffalo NY. And even though I’m a die hard Chiefs fan I go to about two or three Bills games a year with my friends and freeze my butt off just because I love the game of football. Oh and c’mon guys, this will be the third year in a row the Chiefs play the Bills and they are all in KC! Share the love a little, haha!
Big screen TVs are now in the mainstream with most homes having at least a ’smallish’ 42″ set, now seen as entry level size. It wasn’t but a decade ago that folks were going to Sports Bars to see the game on a 50″ (then) giant screen.
HD adds to the home viewing and 3D/HD is getting a foothold. Interactive camera angles, wagering, and entering the virtual stadium as a live attendee are right over the horizon.
And that’s just where the NFL wants us. Given all that, who really cares where the game is played? Oh, those participating team’s fans might be an exception but the vast majority is okay with the game played at the North Pole as long as all the advanced technical goodies are theirs to enjoy.
What a joke, bought and paid for an out door superbowl in the winter and 20 below……………
You have to be nuts to want a Super Bowl played in a blizzard with 20 below temps. Never gonna happen!
I don’t mind cold weather games, as does anyone else but I for sure have no desire to watch a SB that could get ruined by really bad weather, if it happens. Who wants to watch it if the teams are slipping and sliding around on a freezing rain turf and have no chance to make a good game of it, but more of a crap shoot on who wore the proper shoes!
I think it is a great city and whatnot, but would just hate to see the game ruined by extreme weather.
I hope this SB is between two dome teams in a freezing rain.
No problem with an outdoor cold weather Super Bowl here. Can’t possibly be much worse than some of the days I’ve spent in the upper deck at Arrowhead in December.
If you can afford the ticket, you can afford appropriate cold weather attire.
So the world has gone insane .. think about a blizzard and the game is postponed. Next, they reschedule for the following Sunday with the temp. -17 degrees and wind gusting to 60 mph so wind chil is – 40 degrees. Sure I’m going to be happy to shell out 500 bucks for that … and think about the quality of play. 3 yeards and a cloud of snow. Other than paying back the Giants n Jets for building a new stadium it makes no sense. Maybe I’m just negative and it’ll be sunny with 30 degrees weather … the NFL is certainly betting on it.
Who cares if the Super Bowl is played in cold weather? Not the 300 million people who aren’t there.